Ah ! That makes it worth getting a lot more. I am actually pretty interested in the Frogger article because I know about nothing about the history of that game.
Right ! And after reading the piece of junk they called "the history of Frogger" I STILL know ZERO about the history of the game.
They BARELY touch the original arcade version.There is not even a NAME of the guy(s) behind this game !!
NOTHING is told about the process of designing the original, no interviews with the programmer/developper. For Christs sake, there isnt even a picture of the arcade machine !!!!!!
After about 2 colums reading we get a souped up list of raunchy follow up games which are either totally uninteresting or plain trash. Frogger is Frogger and he shouldnt be walking straight up or in fact do anything else than crossing that road and pont !!!
DEEPLY disappointed by this article, it seems like it was written bij a 20 year old who thinks a Playstation2 is a classic system.....
Definitly not on par like articles about Asteroids.
